Are Your Cores And Parts Costs A Money Pit?
Connect with us
Close Sidebar Panel Open Sidebar Panel

Finance

Are Your Cores And Parts Costs A Money Pit?

Learn how to implement a process for handling core returns that makes you money, not loses it.

David Rogers is the president of Auto Profit Masters and Shop4D, the industry’s first AI-driven, all-in-one shop-management system that allows each component – from the point of sale to labor guides, inspections, marketing, estimating, parts ordering and even shop management – to talk to one another, improving efficiency and saving money. Learn more and register for a free webinar at shop4d.com. Reach David via email at [email protected] or toll-free at 866-826-7911.

Through 20 years of consulting, across hundreds of shops and thousands of employees, I have found no more consistent problem than shops losing money on their core and part returns.

Click Here to Read More
Advertisement

It makes sense, of course. Returns are completely detached from the main workflow. It’s a process that works entirely independently from diagnosing, estimating, and repairing.

But the story is the same, time after time in shop after shop: when there’s no process and no accountability, the shop ends up throwing away thousands of dollars – tens of thousands of dollars per year – right into the dumpster.

Thankfully, getting core and part returns under control takes little more than proper processes and accountability, and you can ensure that that credit pipeline flows into your bank account instead of the garbage with very little effort. The only trick is to create a sentry that looks for leaks in three specific places in your return pipeline.

The process wasn’t always so clear in our shop. Years and years ago, when I first joined Keller Bros as a service advisor, there was no process in place at all. It was left to the technician and advisor to hopefully communicate, so that cores were hopefully saved and returned, so that hopefully the store gave us a credit. If we were lucky, at the end of all of that, the bookkeeper might reconcile the credit memos to the monthly statement.

It was haphazard, inconsistent and fundamentally broken, and it meant that we weren’t getting credits and were literally throwing money away every month. This included some really expensive cores – engines and rack and pinions! Literally sent to the dump.

Advertisement

The first step in the process was ensuring that the tech knew about the core, and his responsibility to pull it.

Our solution more than 20 years ago was analog, but effective. When new parts went back to the bay for the repair, they were sent with the repair order that had red stickies flagging which parts had cores. It didn’t have to say anything more than “CORE CHARGE ON RACK AND PINION” for the techs to know their responsibility.

At the same time, that core return was added to a tracking sheet by the service advisor: which repair order, which part, which supplier, what dollar amount, which tech.

Advertisement

Those checks and balances were critical for holding the techs accountable for pulling those cores, because it meant we had a way to ensure that they were notified of the core and that the core made its way to our returns shelf. If the tech didn’t pull the core after they were clearly trained and clearly notified, we gave them a choice: dig it out of the dumpster, or pay the shop back.

Once the core was picked up, and the advisor received the tracking slip from the driver, it was then the advisor’s responsibility to update that tracking spreadsheet with when it was picked up.

Advertisement

You’ll notice that the bookkeeper has not figured into any of this process so far, and that’s intentional. Leaving the tracking of what needs to be returned, to whom, and for what repair order is inviting chaos. When we rely on the parts driver to perfectly record which parts they picked up, and assume that the bookkeeper will then be able to turn that into a perfect accounting of what returns are still outstanding, we are inviting shrinkage.

The only people who can accurately reconcile what needs to be returned with what was returned are the people on the front counter who oversee each phase of the return process. The more easily and transparently this process happens, the better you can ensure that parts and core returns go from the vehicle to the parts store in a way that ensures you get paid.

Advertisement

The other reason why not to use bookkeepers at this stage can be explained through a story that happened right in our shop. Years and years ago, when we had first gotten the return process under control and ensured that we were sending each and every part back, our process was to hand the tracking slips to the bookkeeper to log.

One day, after parting ways with that bookkeeper, while cleaning the office to prepare for a new employee, we pulled the desk away from the wall to find months – at least 4 or 5 months – of parts returns receipts from parts stores that the bookkeeper had hidden behind the desk rather than track. She knew that we weren’t paying attention and took advantage of us.

Advertisement

It took days to dig out from that mess, all because we didn’t have a way to quickly understand the status of all returns in progress. Now we know: every phase of the return has to be transparent, easily reconciled and monitored. It doesn’t take more than a few minutes per month with the right process in place!

When the return leaves the shop, however, is when it’s most critical that good processes are in place. Because it’s at this point that your tracking spreadsheet does its most important job: making sure that you receive credit memos for all existing returns.

Advertisement

I have no doubt that parts stores are not trying to play games with returns. Every time we’ve had to challenge a vendor on a missing credit, they’ve made it right. But not once has a parts store come to us to let us know they had missed a return and here’s a credit for the part they had missed. 

Which is the whole point in this procedure, of course: every person in the chain doesn’t only have to know their responsibility, they also have to be held accountable to fulfilling it through good tracking and measurement.

Advertisement

It’s not enough to ensure that we pulled the part and returned it. The job of the service advisor isn’t over until a credit memo is back for all outstanding returns. Then we can turn it over to the bookkeeper.

That’s because the final leak in the pipeline is ensuring that the credit actually shows up on the monthly statement, by reconciling all credit memos to the statement sent by the vendor.

This process isn’t complex. It doesn’t require sophisticated software or communication. And at the end of the day, many shop management systems can make this process even easier.

Advertisement

But the critical part isn’t the tool. It’s the clear expectations for everyone involved, and the accountability for following the process. If it takes seconds to log a return, but the service advisor doesn’t know it’s their responsibility, the whole process breaks down and the shop loses thousands of dollars each month.

Which is ultimately the big takeaway here: the greatest and most sophisticated tools in the world don’t mean anything if the team isn’t accountable for using them properly, and incentivized to help the shop stay healthy and profitable.

Whether you’re getting returns under control to capture lost money, or trying to capture more profit each month, it starts with transparent measurement, proper procedures, and clear expectations across all areas of the shop. 

Advertisement

The more places you can create measurement, accountability and transparency, the healthier your shop will become!

Advertisement
Click to comment
Connect
Shop Owner Magazine