A/C Update: The Case Against HFO-1234yf 'Heats Up' -

A/C Update: The Case Against HFO-1234yf ‘Heats Up’

Volkswagen head Ferdinand Piech has now ended the silence that had fallen on the automotive industry following Daimler's announcement of its plans to withdraw from using HFO-1234yf in future vehicles.

Volkswagen head Ferdinand Piech has now ended the silence that had fallen on the automotive industry following Daimler’s announcement of its plans to withdraw from using HFO-1234yf in future vehicles.

According to the site R744.com, Piech told journalists that, “The right refrigerant is CO2. It does not burn, for sure. Until this comes, we will continue using the proven refrigerant R-134a.”

Daimler, the manufacturer of Mercedes-Benz vehicles, had said Sept. 25 that it would not be using the new HFO refrigerant R-1234yf in its vehicle air conditioning systems. Instead, it says it plans to continue using R-134a.

The German car and truck manufacturer has raised new safety concerns with usage of the internationally recognized refrigerant replacement for R-134a following its own independent safety tests.
While concerns had been raised in the past — particularly in Germany — as to the issue of its “mild” flammability, the climate-friendly R-1234yf was to be implemented worldwide in 2013 models.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) had perceived the new refrigerant to be safe. Its findings were the result of numerous laboratory and crash tests carried out by international vehicle manufacturers and independent institutions.

But Daimler said it has carried out a series of additional tests on the new refrigerant as part of a new real-life test scenario developed in-house, which goes above and beyond the legally prescribed requirements.

“In the new real-life test scenario, the refrigerant is dynamically dispersed at high pressure near to hot components of the test vehicle’s exhaust system,” said the report. “This corresponds to a serious head-on collision in which the refrigerant line is severed and the reproducible results demonstrate that refrigerant, which is otherwise difficult to ignite under laboratory conditions, can indeed prove to be flammable in a hot engine compartment.”

Daimler said that similar tests carried out with the current R-134a refrigerant did not result in ignition.
“Due to the new findings of this study and the high safety demands at Mercedes-Benz, this chemical will not be used in its products,” says a company statement.

“The company therefore wishes to continue to use the proven and safe R-134a refrigerant in its vehicles. Daimler has already informed the relevant authorities of these facts and will also make the results of this investigation available to all relevant associations as well as to other vehicle manufacturers,” it said.

The ‘Smoking Gun’?
Daimler welcomed VW’s decision to not use R-1234yf. An official Daimler video has been released that the company says proves that under real-life conditions, R-1234yf starts burning after two seconds, releasing highly toxic substances.

You can access the video at: http://r744.com/web/assets/video/1234yf-vs-134a-fire.mp4.

According to Daimler, a blue flash fire appears after about two seconds, indicating that the R-1234yf is burning. Released by a remotely controlled valve in the refrigerant piping, it releases highly toxic substances before the fire is extinguished after 12 seconds.

Within this short time period the flames’ yellow color indicate that the fire has already spread to the plastic parts of the motor compartment, and the front windshield is corroded by the aggressive acid.

Daimler’s tet on a Mercedes B 180 was said to have occurred under "real-life" conditions.

This test, conducted by Daimler on a Mercedes B 180, was said to have occurred under real-life conditions. The automaker says it proves that the refrigerant so far assumed to be “mildly flammable” is indeed ignited instantly, as compared to the conventional refrigerant R-134a also shown in the test.

One of the major arguments — that the flammability concerns for R-134a and R-1234yf would be comparable and in fact negligible — falls apart, sparking a discussion if the approval for R-1234yf now has to be revised.

Daimler said that this test is replicable at any time and to stress its message, the carmaker repeated the test live in front of other automotive companies and public authorities, as well as to the chemical maker Honeywell, which currently holds a global patent on the R-1234yf refrigerant.

Following a meeting with Mercedes-Benz, Honeywell reported that it did not see any evidence that the car manufacturer’s findings into the safety of R-1234yf had added any substantial new information to previous comprehensive risk assessments.

“The Mercedes-Benz testing was conducted without the participation of any reputable third party and without consultation with others in the industry,” said a Honeywell spokesperson.

Honeywell then pointed out that HFO-1234yf was the subject of comprehensive testing conducted over a three-year period under the Cooperative Research Program (CRP) of SAE International using proven, standard methods for evaluating new products and materials in automobiles.

“That testing, which was sponsored by 15 global automakers including all leading German automakers, concluded that HFO-1234yf is safe for use in automobile applications,” said a Honeywell spokesman.

“While Honeywell appreciates Daimler’s willingness to discuss the results of its in-house tests, we do not see any evidence that the findings have added any substantial new information to the comprehensive risk assessments conducted under the CRP.”

The refrigerant manufacturer maintains that in today’s automobiles, there are several useful materials under the hood that are more flammable, including brake and transmission fluids, coolant, lubricants and gasoline.
“Automakers can safely use these flammable materials through design that minimizes the risks,” says Honeywell.

“In fact, OEMs have already taken appropriate vehicle design steps to ensure the safe use of HFO-1234yf even under extreme conditions, as they do for other flammable materials.

Honeywell said it had a constructive dialogue with Daimler and asked them to review their designs to determine the necessary modifications required to further minimize any flammability risks.

The refrigerant maker also offered its engineering expertise to work alongside Daimler’s engineers to develop a solution for their vehicles and meet the Jan. 1, 2013, deadline for the European Union’s Mobile Air Conditioning Directive to replace R-134a in vehicles.

“We regret the position that Daimler has taken in isolation and believe that it does not reflect the industry’s collaborative and transparent testing processes, which have ensured the safe implementation of many innovative materials within automobiles,” Honeywell said.

Back to the Drawing Board?
In response to Volkswagen’s recent press statement that “CO2 is the right refrigerant,” SAE International president Frank Klegon has again invited all automobile manufacturers to join in an industry collaborative effort to fully evaluate the technical aspects of the use of CO2 as an automotive air conditioning refrigerant.
SAE International has unquestioned expertise in the research, analysis and application of a variety of automotive refrigerants.

In the last decade, more than 10 major SAE CRP projects have provided forums for subject matter experts from around the industry to meet, discuss and agree on advantages and disadvantages of various alternative refrigerants, as well as the management of accompanying risks.

“The implementation of CO2 as an automotive refrigerant is not without technical challenges,” Klegon said.
The U.S. EPA has published its concerns regarding the use of CO2 as a mobile air conditioning refrigerant for passenger cars. Under its Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) program published this year, the EPA found that the use of CO2 posed risks that were lower than or comparable to the risks posed by other acceptable substitutes.

However, it specified the use of fittings with specific dimensions to deal with the higher-pressure refrigerant. In addition, in the event of a CO2 leak into the passenger area, it placed maximum short-term exposure limits of 3% (30,000 ppm) averaged over 15 minutes with a ceiling limit of 4% in the passenger breathing zone.

EPA reports have revealed that exposures over 4% (40,000 ppm) CO2 are likely to cause discomfort and signs of intoxication that could impair the driver’s response to road and driving conditions, and could create safety and health risks to the passengers.

While Daimler is keeping open all options for the best refrigerant to be used in the future, among them CO2, VW has made clear that the natural refrigerant is the direction to go, regardless of the SNAP findings.

As a reaction to VW’s announcement, Daimler told the press that “we are happy that VW follows us in our evaluation of the risks associated to the new refrigerant” while also clarifying that “if the VW corporation excludes the use of R-1234yf, we would welcome this decision. We are currently investigating different options for a different refrigerant, and this includes also the use of CO2.”

Sources: Honeywell, SAE International, PR Newswire and R744.com

You May Also Like

Phone Shoppers Made Easy

Although there is no silver bullet that will allow you to bring in every first-time caller, there are a number of things you can do to get more appointments. In this article, I would like to share some of the best practices your advisors can use that will generate immediate results.

By Bob
Cooper of Elite

With
vehicles being built better than ever before, and with service intervals
continually being extended, you are going to see your customers less often.
This means your service advisors are going to have to be razor sharp when the
phone rings. Although there is no silver bullet that will allow you to bring in
every first-time caller, there are a number of things you can do to get more
appointments. In this article, I would like to share some of the best practices
your advisors can use that will generate immediate results.
In order for
someone to buy from you, three things need to occur: They have to like you,
they have to trust you, and they have to view you as a credible expert. So when
your phone rings, the first thing your advisors need to sell is themselves; not
the service or repair. The best way of accomplishing this goal is with a
professional, courteous and upbeat greeting, such as “Thank you for calling
Elite Auto Care, this is Bob. How can I help you this morning?” By using these
words we’re showing appreciation, by volunteering the name of our company we’re
assuring the callers that they’ve called the right number, and by providing our
name we’re beginning to build personal relationships. By asking how we can
help, we’re asking a question that will allow us to control the conversation.
By being upbeat and using the right tonality, our likeability goes up, and the
customer’s anxiety goes down.
The second
thing your advisors will need to do is slow the conversation down so the
callers don’t feel rushed, and they’ll have to become good detectives by asking
a number of questions. By having the callers talk, it will take their focus off
of the price, and it will allow them to begin to feel more comfortable with
your advisors at the same time.
When it comes
to asking for the appointment, one of the best kept secrets I can share with
you is this: With rare exception, your advisors need to offer every caller a
choice of appointment times, and whenever possible, one of those options should
be for them to bring the vehicle in now. For example; “I can squeeze you in
now, or would 2:15 be better for you?”
When it comes to auto repair, customers love finality, which is why
providing the “now” option is a powerful sales tool.
Now here’s
the absolute best-kept secret for dealing with the tough first-time callers.
Every one of your advisors needs to be aware that many “price shoppers” are
asking for price just to start the conversation, and beyond that, with rare
exception, callers don’t know the questions they should be asking. This is why
it’s a good idea to ask your service advisors to write down a list of the
questions that they think an educated caller would ask. Once they have their
lists completed, and committed to memory, then it’s easy for them to respond to
price inquiries with a statement like, “Well Larry, I know price is important
to you, and it should be, but if you call five different shops today, you’ll
more than likely get at least five different prices. Some of the other
questions you might want to ask are how long they’ve been in business, whether
or not they have certified technicians and a drug-free workplace program, and
you might want to have them walk you through their diagnostic processes as
well. You might also want to ask them if they always explore all of the options
that are available to customers when it comes to any recommended repairs, what
kind of warranties they provide, and if those warranties are in writing.”  Ladies and gentlemen, I’ve closed hundreds,
if not thousands of tough first-time “price shoppers” using this technique, so
I know it will work for you.
 If you’re still not quite sold, then consider
this. If you take my recommendations, when those price shoppers start calling
other shops, you know as well as I do that they’ll more than likely ask some of
the questions your advisors suggested to them. Not only will your competitors
be caught off guard and struggle with the answers, but in each case, the
callers will be thinking of your advisors. This is when they’ll not only realize
how well your advisors handled the call, but they’ll trust your advisors, and
you bet; they’ll now view them as credible experts as well.
For help permanently
increasing your service advisors’ sales and CSI scores, learn more about the Elite Masters Service Advisor Training
Program.

The True Cost Of Comebacks

Comebacks are a hot topic today. You need to track all comebacks, determine the reason (tech error, part error, training issue, other) and then calculate the true cost of the comeback.

Want To Increase A/C Sales?

Have your techs, as part of their preliminary checks, turn on the A/C and see if the system is working. Is the compressor turning on? Are all the fan speeds working? Is the system getting cold? Is there a smell from the vents?

Call For Entries For The ATMC National Excellence In Training Awards

The Automotive Training Managers Council (ATMC) has issued a call for entries for the 2014 National Excellence in Training Awards. The annual program is designed to highlight the importance of training to the success of the transportation industry by honoring highly effective or innovative training programs. The awards are open to any person or entity providing training in the industry.

CARS 2014: ‘Not Your Father’s Oldsmobile’

From ASA comes word that CARS this year “is not your father’s Oldsmobile.” This year’s CARS will be held July 30-Aug. 2 in Detroit and, for the first time, the focus will be on younger techs. Each program at CARS this year has been handpicked with an eye toward making your shop better, said Donny Seyfer, chairman-elect of the Automotive Service Association, which sponsors CARS.

Other Posts

GAAS Attendees Get ‘Connected’ In Chicago

Attendees of the Global Automotive Aftermarket Symposium’s (GAAS) 2014 Connected conference were engaged in a range of high-level topics affecting the automotive aftermarket now and in the future.

Raybestos Rattlesnake Sweepstakes Winner Receives His Ride

Not even heavy rain and winds could dampen the festive mood at Automotive Electric Distributors (AED) in Vancouver, Wash., on Friday, May 9, the day that David Cramer received the keys to his custom 2014 Raybestos Rattlesnake Toyota Tundra.

NACE/CARS 2014 Meets Shop Owners’ Education, Training Needs

NACE/CARS 2014 has announced the full training and education conference program that organizers say will have shop owners, technicians and industry stakeholders covered from A to Z when it comes to training, education and unbeatable new sessions. In addition to this year’s event being the largest conference offering in NACE/CARS history, show organizers also have many of the industry’s leading experts speaking at this year’s event.

June 9-15 Is Automotive Service Professionals Week

The National Institute for Automotive Service Excellence (ASE) has declared June 9-15 as National Automotive Service Professionals Week. Building on the success of Automotive Service Professionals Day established in 2001, ASE launched National Automotive Service Professional’s Week in 2005 to honor the commitment and dedication of automotive, truck and collision technicians, along with parts specialists and other support professionals who serve the motoring public.